A Scholar and a Gentleman: Remembering Ken Starr


By Paul J. McNulty

I first met Ken Starr at the Department of Justice in 1990 while serving as the department’s assistant director of legal policy. A young lawyer only 10 years removed from Grove City College, I was surrounded by a new generation of legal giants in our nation’s capital. In 1991, I was promoted and began participating in Attorney General Bill Barr’s morning senior staff meetings. Around the table sat Bob Mueller, chief of the Criminal Division, Mike Luttig, assistant attorney general for legal counsel and future judge on the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals and general counsel of Boeing Aircraft, and Ken Starr, solicitor general, the Bush administration’s scholarly advocate before the Supreme Court. When Starr was unable to attend, he sent his deputy—a rising stalwart named John Roberts.

Judge Starr, so-called because he served as a judge on the prestigious D.C. Court of Appeals before stepping down to become solicitor general, was only 45 years old at the time. But in my eyes, he was a lawyer’s lawyer, a legal guru capable of instantly and insightfully expounding on any topic of constitutional law. Barr didn’t suffer fools as he fired challenging questions at DOJ’s leadership. Yet Starr was always unruffled. He sat calmly and confidently, bearing his distinctive grin. I marveled at his intelligence and articulation.

If life was baseball, Ken Starr was Albert Pujols and I was a September call-up. Yet in every interaction I had with him, he never made me feel small or unworthy. He was unfailingly gracious, even to the point of seeking my thoughts on challenging issues. He was a scholar and a gentleman.

When George H.W. Bush lost the presidential election to Bill Clinton in 1992, this legal leadership team was dispersed to various big law firms throughout Washington. None of us could have predicted that Barr would be attorney general again, Mueller would be FBI director, and Starr would be tapped to investigate the new president and develop a case for the second impeachment in U.S. history. I returned to the House of Representatives in 1994. Four years later, I was chief counsel and director of communications in the Clinton impeachment proceedings, and I was reunited with my hero, now Independent Counsel Ken Starr.

Starr was summoned to testify before the House Judiciary Committee. It was one of those surreal, made-for-TV hearings that lasted all day. Not surprisingly, Ken knocked the ball out of the park. He was consistently patient and respectful as one Democratic member after another took their best shot. He was Pujols taking batting practice from Little League pitchers. At the end of the day, the committee’s Democrats requested that Starr return for more rounds of questions in a rare evening session. They were hoping to catch him off his game after hours of talking and when the television audience would be much larger. Ken graciously consented.

In a small behind-the-scenes office, I huddled with him and a few of his advisors (including Brett Kavanaugh, if I remember correctly) to prepare for the last leg of this hearing marathon. I urged him to stay strong and repeat what he had been explaining so remarkably well all day. With his signature warm smile, Ken took the advice humbly and responded masterfully that evening until the Democrats grew tired of repeating the same questions. Google the video of this to appreciate this man’s amazing mind and character.

At the conclusion of his independent counsel duties, Ken Starr entered the world of higher education, first as dean of Pepperdine Law School and then as president of Baylor University. What a joy to connect with him once again at my first national conference for presidents of independent colleges in 2015. As the president of Baylor, he was the big man at the conference—Pujols in a cap and gown. Ken and his wife Alice greeted me and my wife Brenda with exceptional warmth and immediately became our role models. I confess to a bit of pride as hundreds of other presidents wondered why President Starr was giving the Grove City College president so much time and attention.

At that happy reunion, I planted a seed: Would Starr come to Grove City and speak at my inauguration as the college’s new president? On March 23, 2015, the Honorable Kenneth Starr graced us with his presence. Standing in the pulpit of our magnificent chapel, he eloquently described America’s foundation of faith and our Founders’ commitment to the freedom of conscience. He beautifully connected it to the mission of Grove City College: “From its beginning in 1876 until this happy day, the inauguration of this good friend and my former colleague Paul McNulty, Grove City College has stood as a fierce and determined champion of belief, of faith, and the freedom of the human spirit.” Words failed in expressing my appreciation.

The potential interception of our careers ended long before I learned of Ken’s passing into glory. The years of selfless public service apparently caught up with him. Looking back at the people who made a lasting mark on my life, I will always cherish the impact of his decency and graciousness. He was extraordinarily present in every human encounter.

By today’s standards of political commentary, Ken Starr was an anomaly. His words were always measured, soaked in civility, and somehow communicated a touch of kindness no matter how divisive the discussion became. Such humility and self-control doesn’t boost cable news ratings. But Ken’s erudition was so compelling he remained a popular program guest. For all of us who remain struggling hitters, we should learn to model Ken Starr’s swing. Rest in peace, my friend.

The Honorable Paul J. McNulty ’80 is the ninth President of Grove City College, and former Deputy Attorney General of the United States.



More Resources


04/24/2024
Columbia Left-Wing Radicalism as Dangerous as It Was in 1968
More than 50 years after anti-Vietnam War demonstrators roiled the Columbia campus in 1968, anti-Israel agitators are disrupting the school's operations.

more info


04/24/2024
Abolish DEI Statements


more info


04/24/2024
Why Elites Are Rarely Held Accountable for Terrible Mistakes
Lionel Shriver on why elites are rarely held accountable for their most damaging mistakes.

more info


04/24/2024
MAGA 2.0
Can J.D. Vance keep it alive after Trump?

more info


04/24/2024
Will Israel Be a Game-Changer In The 2024 Election?
Republicans now the only major party that remains solid in its support for long-time ally Israel.

more info


04/24/2024
Iran vs. Israel: Outline of a Different Future Is Visible
Both seem keen to limit hostilities, and key Arab states are ready to resist Tehran. But real change will require new Israeli leadership, says Guardian columnist Jonathan Freedland

more info


04/24/2024
Taylor Swift: Why You Gotta Be So Mean?
In her latest album, the pop star crucifies ex-boyfriends like never before.

more info


04/24/2024
We're at Peak Sports Right Now for a Reason
Americans are tuning out a presidential election in favor of distractions.

more info


04/24/2024
Young People Are Enraged, Opting Out of America
NYU business school professor Scott Galloway talks to MSNBC's "Morning Joe" about why young people are struggling economically:

more info


04/24/2024
In 2024, Americans Will Be Voting Like It's 1892
Both candidates have a record, and we know which president saw success and which one has only produced one crisis after another.

more info


04/24/2024
On Trial, Trump Isn't the Superhero MAGA Craves
He wants his devotees to see the court case as trial by combat, with him as warrior. But the truth is more pathetic

more info


04/24/2024
Trump's Trial Will Only Help Him
If Trump should be reelected in November, he may owe his victory in no small part to Alvin Bragg and Juan Merchan.

more info


04/24/2024
Student Protesters Are Schooling Their Universities
What is a university for? At Columbia University and its affiliated women's college, Barnard, it is ostensibly to value critical thought, a broad mind, and a commitment to reason.

more info


04/24/2024
Meet the Zoomerwaffen
The Jewish Question: It's (Suddenly) Complicated. Plus: A big personal reveal!

more info


04/24/2024
'Grading for Equity' Is Hurting School Kids
Joe Feldman has faced many tough crowds in the course of successfully selling his "Grading for Equity" program to school districts across the nation. During the consultant's presentations, teachers concerned that his approach lowers standards have rolled their eyes, questioned his understanding of students, and worse.

more info



Custom Search

More Politics Articles:

Related Articles

Speaker Pelosi's Drug Plan Misses the Mark


House Speaker Nancy Pelosi just proposed one of the most ambitious healthcare reforms since the Affordable Care Act. She hopes her plan, The Lower Drug Costs Now Act, will reduce the "out of control" prices that are "crushing Americans at the pharmacy counter."

The Soviet-Afghan War at Forty:


In the early morning hours of Christmas Day 1979, Soviet forces began invading Afghanistan. The international community was shocked by the intervention; even though Afghanistan had been unstable for some time, most assumed that the Soviet Union would stick to its usual policy of indirect aid. Soviet policymakers, however, had several reasons for taking action when they did, including the deterioration of détente with the United States, alarm at the Afghan regime's behavior, the desire to replace President Hafizullah Amin with a more pliable ruler, fears of foreign interference in Afghanistan, and national security concerns.

Brexit: What Is at Stake?


I feel badly for the people of the United Kingdom. Brexit — the move to withdraw the UK from the European Union — has left the United Kingdom anything but united. Even families are being ripped apart. The most notable involves Prime Minister Boris Johnson's own family. His brother Jo (a fine fellow whom I met several years ago) resigned his seat in Parliament and his place in his brother's cabinet because he wanted to remain and Boris wants to leave.

Klein v. Oregon: Religious Liberty and Freedom of Speech vs. Gay Rights


Among recent actions by the U.S. Supreme Court, a four-sentence order may set the stage for the court to eventually address the collision between free speech and religious freedom on one hand and gay rights on the other. The order voided a judgment by the state of Oregon that had imposed a $135,000 fine on Portland-area bakery owners—the Kleins—for refusing to bake a wedding cake for a lesbian couple. Oregon maintained that its anti-discrimination law condemned such a rebuff even when the bakery owners' religious convictions run counter to participating in a same-sex wedding.

Holidays and Politics: Rebuilding Civility


With the chill in the air and the leaves already falling, the holidays are just around the corner. Whether you're hosting or being hosted, the old rule of not discussing religion, money, or politics serves as a reminder of the issues which can divide even those who love each other the most. But in an era where everything, from ice cream to music, is politicized, avoiding political topics in conversation with those of differing views becomes almost impossible. Is this overly divisive and ever-present political tension healthy for society?

Addressing Out-of-Pocket Costs Key to Health Improvement & Cost Savings


More than 190 million Americans suffer from chronic diseases. For them, healthcare reform isn't a political football -- it's a matter of life and death.

Pipeline Hate Is Misplaced


Sixteen-year-old Swedish student Greta Thunberg admonished global leaders at last year's United Nations: "We are in the beginning of a mass extinction, and all you can talk about is money and fairy tales of eternal economic growth. How dare you!"

Trump's New Drug Pricing Plan Isn't "The Best Deal" For Patients


President Trump will soon unveil a new plan to reduce drug prices.

With Coronavirus, Trump White House Should Revive Drug Rebate Reform


High out of pocket costs likely won't be an issue when a treatment for the coronavirus becomes available. Based on past epidemics, it's probable the government will direct patients to receive a vaccine without having to hand over a copay to an insurance company.

Thank This Obscure Law for a Potential Coronavirus Vaccine


According to the Milken Institute, over 70 treatments for COVID-19 are already in clinical trials or progressing toward clinical trials. Several of the inventions behind this flurry of activity resulted from government funded research in U.S. universities.

America Needs Non-Profits Now More Than Ever


The COVID-19 pandemic has brought the country to a crawl. Lawmakers and consumers alike are rightly worried about the economic security of shuttered bars, restaurants, and retail locations. But many have largely ignored the nation's charities.

Washington Wants to Forfeit Our Best Weapon Against Coronavirus


Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) and several senior House lawmakers recently announced a plan to impose price controls and seize patents on any COVID-19 vaccines and treatments in development. They vowed to strike down any emergency stimulus packages excluding such measures.

Crack Down on China—But Do It Wisely


The Chinese Communist Party poses a dire threat to America and the rest of the free world. Party leadership actively covered up the initial coronavirus outbreak -- and even persecuted doctors who tried to warn the public. China's leaders hoarded masks and other medical supplies, which resulted in shortages of personal protective equipment in the United States.

Helping Unemployed Americans


Unemployed Americans need cash. We go to work in return for a paycheck. With unemployment we lose the paycheck. It's a simple but very painful formula for millions of Americans.

The Problem with Inheritance Taxes


A recent opinion piece in The New York Times, "Tax the Rich and Their Heirs — more fairly," was both reassuring and refreshing. It was reassuring to know that policy debates about relatively prosaic public policy issues continue to be debated, even though the country is convulsed with violent unrest and pandemic-related stresses. It is refreshing that the tone of the writer, New York University law professor Lily Batchelder, was measured and civil at a time when so much writing is shrill and strident.